The Czech Republic in the European Defence Agency: the question of effectiveness
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Jan Masaryk Centre of International Studies of the University of Economics in Prague, Czech Republic
Data publikacji: 06-10-2020
 
Studia Politologiczne 2020;57
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE ARTYKUŁU
At a general level, the article focuses on the relation between states and international organizations. In current era, states and international organizations coexist in international system. Their relation has been researched many times, but the question which is still rather unanswered relates to the management of membership of states in international organizations. The states nowadays participate in hundreds of different organizations. The tricky part that remains to be examined more in details is how to analyse the effectiveness of the engagement of a country in a concrete international organization. The article investigates further the case of the Czech Republic and it analyses its performance and relevance in the European Defence Agency (EDA) applying the research design which was proposed in 20122. The team of researchers proposed four criteria: objective pursued, personal representation, cost/performance ratio and activities implemented. The analysis is based on the examination of the Czech policy goals and priorities in the EDA. It also explor es the area in more details conducting semi-structured interviews with the representatives of different Czech state bodies and employees of the Agency.
INFORMACJE O RECENZOWANIU
Sprawdzono w systemie antyplagiatowym
 
REFERENCJE (13)
1.
P. Balík, Role of small states in international organizations: the case of Slovakia in the United Nations Security Council, Budapest 2008.
 
2.
J. Corbett, X. Yi-Chong and P. Weller, Small states and the ‘throughput’ legitimacy of international organizations, «Cambridge Review of International Affairs» 2018, vol. 31, no. 2.
 
3.
J.A.K. Hey, Small States in World Politics. Explaining Foreign Policy Behaviour, Lynne Rienner Publishers 2003.
 
4.
C. Ingebritsen et al., Small States in International Relations, Washington: University of Washington Press 2003.
 
5.
Z. Kasáková, T. Weiss, Ve správnou chvíli na správném místě: Prosazování zájmů České republiky v Evropském parlamentu, UMV. Discussion Paper 2016.
 
6.
R.O. Keohane, Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics, «International Organization» 1969, vol. 23.
 
7.
V. Kolín, Evropská obranná agentura v šesti letech, «Obrana a strategie» 2010, vol. 1, https://www.obranaastrategie.c... (20.03.3020).
 
8.
M. Kolmaš, Š. Kolmašová, M. Kořan and V. Bílková (et al.), Česká republika v mezinárodních organizacích: mezi teorií a praxí, Praha: Ústav mezinárodních vztahů 2015.
 
9.
H. Laasme, NATO and the European Defence Agency – not a zero-sum game, NATO, 25.10.2015.https://www.nato.int/docu/revi... (30.10.2019).
 
10.
G. Moynier, Les bureaux internationaux des unions universelles, Cherbuliez Genève 1892.
 
11.
D. Panke, Small states in the European Union: Structural disadvantages in EU policymaking and counter-strategies, «Journal of European Public Policy» 2011, vol. 17.
 
12.
A. Vandenbosch, The Small States in International Politics and Organization, «The Journal of Politics» 1964, vol. 26, no. 2.
 
13.
J. Vestergaard, R.H. Wade, Protecting power: How Western states retain the dominant voice in the World Bank’s governance, «World Development» 2013, vol. 46.
 
ISSN:1640-8888