PL EN RU
What Can Anti-federalists Teach Contemporary Europeans?
 
 
Подробнее
Скрыть детали
1
Katedra Doktryn Polityczno-Prawnych, Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
 
 
Дата публикации: 2025-09-19
 
 
Studia Politologiczne 2025;77
 
КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА:
СТАТЬЯ:
Brussels bureaucracy, in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Ventotene Manifesto, today seeks to dismantle nation-states and create a European superstate. However, these efforts face resistance from political forces that view Europe as a community of sovereign states. The arguments used in this debate show a striking similarity to those expressed 250 years ago during the debate over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. In particular, the arguments of the Anti-Federalists can today serve as an inspiration for those opposing the federalization of Europe. The author of the article attempts to highlight the similarity between the situation of the United States during the ratification period and today’s European Union, and to demonstrate the relevance of Anti-Federalist arguments in the debate over the future of the European Union.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
ЛИТЕРАТУРА (25)
1.
Brown R. H., Redeeming the Republic: Federalists, Taxation, and the Origins of the Constitution, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London 1993.
 
2.
Dawson H. B. (red.), The Historical Magazine and Notes and Queries Concerning the Antiquities, History and Biography of America, Morrisania 1869, vol. VI.
 
3.
Eliot J., Lippincott J. B. & Co. (red.), The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution as Recommended by The General Convention at Philadelphia, in 1787 (DSSC), vol. II, (1861a), Philadelphia 1861.
 
4.
Eliot J., Lippincott J. B. & Co. (red.), The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution as Recommended by The General Convention at Philadelphia, in 1787 (DSSC), vol. III, (1861b), Philadelphia 1861.
 
5.
Faber M. J., An Anti-federalist Constitution: The Development of Dissent in the Ratification Debates, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence 2019.
 
6.
Federici M. P., The Political Philosophy of Alexander Hamilton, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2012.
 
7.
Grimmel A., Judicial Interpretation or Judicial Activism?: The Legacy of Rationalism in the Studies of the European Court of Justice, «European Law Journal» 2012, nr 18(4).
 
8.
Helios J., Sędziokracja w Unii Europejskiej? Uwagi w kontekście działalności interpretacyjnej Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej, [w:] A. Bator, J. Helios, W. Jedlecka (red.), Rządy prawa i europejska kultura prawna, Wrocław 2014.
 
9.
Josselin J.-M., Marciano A., How the court made a federation of the EU, «The Review of International Organizations» 2007, vol. 2, issue 1.
 
10.
Kenyon C. M., Men of Little Faith: The Anti-Federalists on the Nature of Representative Government, «William and Mary Quarterly» 1955, vol. 12, nr 1.
 
11.
Klarman M. J., The Framers’s Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution, Oxford University Press, New York 2016.
 
12.
Kupersmith A., Montesquieu and the Ideological Strain in Antifederalist Thought, [w:] W. C. McWilliams, M. T. Gibbons (red.), The Federalists, the Antifederalists, and the American Political Tradition, Greenwood, New York 1992.
 
13.
Main J. T., The Antifederalists. Critics of the Constitution 1781–1788, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill 1961.
 
14.
Memoir of Theophilus Parsons, Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Ticknor and Field, Boston 1859.
 
15.
Muszyński M., Działanie TSUE ultra vires a Trybunał Konstytucyjny RP, «Prokuratura i Prawo» 2022, nr 9.
 
16.
Spinnelli A., Rossi E., Manifest z Ventotene, przekł. A. Knuspel, Fundacja Ośrodek Analiz Prawnych, Gospodarczych i Społecznych im. Hipolita Cegielskiego, Bruksela 2019.
 
17.
Storing H. J. (red.), The Anti-federalist. Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago–London 1985.
 
18.
Utopia z Ventotene, «Teologia Polityczna co tydzień» 2016, nr 25.
 
19.
The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution (DHRC), vol. 16. Commentaries on the Constitution, public and private. Volume 4: 1 February to 31 March 1788, The State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Madison 1986.
 
20.
The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution (DHRC), vol. 9. Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Virginia (2), The State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Madison 1990.
 
21.
The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (PTJ), vol. 8, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1953.
 
22.
The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (PTJ), vol. 16, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1961.
 
23.
The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (PTJ), vol. 33, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2006.
 
24.
The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (PTJ), vol. 36, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2009.
 
25.
Wood G. S., Interests and Disinterestedness in the Making of the Constitution, [w:] R. Beeman, S. Botein, E. C. Carter II (red.), Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hil & London 1987.
 
ISSN:1640-8888
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top