PL EN RU
EDMUND BURKE – THE LAST SON OF THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION
 
More details
Hide details
1
profesor nadzwyczajny w Katedrze Doktryn Polityczno- Prawnych na Wydziale Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Publication date: 2019-12-23
 
Studia Politologiczne 2015;38
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The Author demonstrates that in his Reflections and Appeal Edmund Burke argued against the New Whigs’ interpretation of Glorious Revolution. Instead, he gave an Old Whig’ defence of it. Accordingly, the English had not created a new regime but, rather, they restored the old one previously distorted by the Stuarts. Thus, the Revolution was carried out exclusively to preserve the old laws and liberties of Ancient Constitution. In fact, Burke rejected the idea of abstract, metaphysical freedom and defended the notion of freedom deeply rooted in the national heritage including the institutions of Ancient Constitution and the common law tradition. The Author points out that, for Burke, the national institutions, customs, values and liberties were a result of centuries’ long political experiences and social practices. Therefore, Burke used his argument to defend the Ancient liberties of the English as understood by the Old Whigs and to demolish the rationalistic speculations on freedom as practiced by the New Whigs. All in all, the Author claims that defending the Glorious Revolution in this way Burke proved himself to be the last Old Whig.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
 
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Burke E., An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs, in concequence of some late discussion in Parliament, London 1791.
 
2.
Burke E., Rozważania o rewolucji we Francji, przekł. D. Lachowska, Kraków 1994.
 
3.
Dreyer F., The Genesis of Burke’s Reflections, „The Journal of Modern History” 1978, vol. 50, nr 3.
 
4.
Hill B.W., Fox and Burke. The Whig Party and the Question of Principles, 1784–1789, „The English Historical Review” 1974, vol. 89, nr 350.
 
5.
Pieliński K., Konserwatyzm jako oswajanie chaosu świata empirycznego (Przypadek Edmunda Burke’a), Warszawa 1993.
 
6.
Pocock J.G.A., Burke and the Ancient Constitution. A Problem in the History of Ideas, „The Historical Journal” 1960, vol. 3, nr 2.
 
7.
Skinner Q., History and Ideology in the English Revolution, „The Historical Journal” 1965, vol. 8, nr 2.
 
8.
Stanlis P.J., Edmund Burke and the Natural Law, New Brunswick 2003.
 
9.
Stanlis P.J., Edmund Burke. The Enlightenment and Revolution, New Brunswick 1991.
 
10.
The Works and Correspondence of Edmund Burke, F. & J. Rivington, London 1852, vol. I-VI.
 
11.
The Works of Edmund Burke, C.C. Little & J. Brown, Boston 1839, vol. III.
 
12.
The Works of Honourable Edmund Burke (1841), vol. II.
 
13.
The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke in Twelve Volumes, John C. Nimmo, London 1887, vol. III.
 
14.
Tulejski T., Konserwatyzm bez Boga. Dawida Hume’a wizja społeczeństwa, państwa i prawa, Warszawa 2009.
 
15.
Ward L., The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America, Cambridge 2004.
 
16.
Zook M.S., Radical Whigs and Conspiratorial Politics in Late Stuart England, University Park 1999.
 
ISSN:1640-8888