PL EN RU
The Importance of Surveillance in the Context of Contemporary Threats: Based on the Experience of the Terrorist Attacks of 11 September 2001
 
 
Подробнее
Скрыть детали
1
Humanistic Department of the Koszalin University of Technology
Дата публикации: 2022-04-01
 
Studia Politologiczne 2022;63
 
КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА:
СТАТЬЯ:
The main objective of security policy is to prevent threats, which means to fight certain phenomena at their very source. Governments of many countries threatened by a terrorist attack are still searching for an effective way to prevent attacks on intended terrorist targets and to uncover them in time. It is now recognised that monitoring telephone and internet communications is one of the most effective ways to combat terrorism. In recent years, international security has become one of the most debated issues due to, among other things, the coronavirus pandemic and numerous terrorist attacks. An important factor in preventing these threats is how the state and its services function through the use of a variety of tools and techniques, thus creating new and unique ethical and legal problems. The force and impact of state policy measures are often excessive and disproportionate to the threats posed. In this case, civil rights and liberties are most often violated. Doubts that arise when analysing these two values also stimulate reflection on the question to what extent the state is the victim of threats and to what extent it itself is the aggressor. Contemporary threats such as terrorism or the coronavirus pandemic are a major source of public fear that has far-reaching implications for public governance. The analysis carried out in this study examines the use of digital technologies for surveillance and control of the public by governments as a means to combat contemporary threats. The article describes both cases highlighting the importance of digital technology in maintaining security and cites evidence showing the threats that electronic surveillance poses to democratic norms. In other words, digital control over society promotes security but also restricts civil rights and liberties. The article emphasizes the worrying tendency for governments to implement technology rapidly without sufficient concern for the consequences for socio-political life.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
 
ЛИТЕРАТУРА (34)
1.
Bacevich A. J., Prodromou E. H., God is not Neutral. Religion and US Foreign Policy after 9/11, «Orbis» 2004, No. 48/1.
 
2.
Bamford J., The shadow factor: The ultra secret NSA from 9/11 to the eavesdropping on America, Anchor Books 2008.
 
3.
Bhattacharya S. B., Of Democracies, Wars and Responses to War: A Comparative Perspective on War and Security in India and the United States, «India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs» 2013, No. 69/3.
 
4.
Boswell Ch., Migration, security, and legitimacy: some reflections [in:] T. Gives, G. P. Freeman, D. L. Leal (eds.), Immigration Policy and Security: U.S., European, and Commonwealth Perspectives, Routledge 2009.
 
5.
Brzezinski M., Fortress America: On the front lines of Homeland Security: An inside look at the coming surveillance state, Bantam 2004.
 
6.
Burt Ch., Fever detection technology added to biometric hardware by Dermalog, Telpo, DFI, Hikvision and Kogniz, «Biometric update», https://www.biometricupdate.co... (23.09.2021).
 
7.
Cayford M., Pieters W., Effectiveness fettered by bureaucracy: why surveillance technology is not evaluated, «Intelligence and National Security» 2020, Vol. 35/7.
 
8.
Cayford M., Pieters W., Hijzen C., Plots, murders, and money: oversight bodies evaluating the effectiveness of surveillance technology, «Intelligence and National Security» 2019, Vol. 33/7.
 
9.
Christensen D. A., Aars J., Does Democracy Decrease Fear of Terrorism?, «Terrorism and Political Violence» 2019, No. 31/3.
 
10.
Costa L., Virtuality and Capabilities in a World of Ambient Intelligence. New Challenges to Privacy and Data Protection, Springer 2016.
 
11.
Criado H., What Makes Terrorism Salient? Terrorist Strategies, Political Competition, and Public Opinion, «Terrorism and Political Violence» 2017, No. 29/2.
 
12.
Erlanger S., The Coronavirus Inflicts Its Own Kind of Terror, «New York Times», https:// www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/wor... (23.09.2021).
 
13.
Genschel P., Jachtenfuchs M., Postfunctionalism reversed: solidarity and rebordering during the COVID-19 pandemic, «Journal of European Public Policy» 2021, Vol. 28/3.
 
14.
Goold B. J., Privacy, Identity and Security, [in:] B. Goold & L. Lazarus (eds.), Security and Human Rights, Portland 2007.
 
15.
Greitens S. Ch., Surveillance, Security, and Liberal Democracy in the Post-COVID World, «International Organization» 2020, Vol. 74/1.
 
16.
Hoffman B., Inside Terrorism, Columbia University Press 2017.
 
17.
Huq A., Terrorism and Democratic Recession, «University of Chicago Law Review» 2018, No. 85, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p... (23.09.2021).
 
18.
Kołodziejczyk M., Technológia služiaca na zadržiavanie koronavírusu: potenciálne hrozby pre ochranu ľudských práv, «Medzinárodné Vztahy» 2020, No. 18/2.
 
19.
Kostakopoulou D., How to do Things with Security Post 9/11, «Oxford Journal of Legal Studies» 2008, vol. 28/2.
 
20.
Lee T., Lee H., Tracing surveillance and auto-regulation in Singapore: ‘smart’ responses to COVID-19, «Media International Australia» 2020, Vol. 177/1.
 
21.
Le´onard S., Border Controls as a Dimension of the European Union’s Counter-Terrorism Policy: A Critical Assessment, «Intelligence and National Security» 2015, Vol. 30/2–3.
 
22.
Levinson-Waldman R., NSA Surveillance in the War on Terror, [in:] D. Gray, S. E. Henderson (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Surveillance Law, Cambridge University Press 2017.
 
23.
Lidén G., Technology and democracy: validity in measurements of e-democracy, «Democratization» 2015, No. 22/4.
 
24.
Marrs J., The terror conspiracy: Deception, 9/11 and the loss of Liberty, Disinformation 2006.
 
25.
McLeod D. M., Shah D. V., News Frames and National Security, Cambridge University Press 2014.
 
26.
Monaghan J., Performing counter-terrorism: Police newsmaking and the dramaturgy of security, «Crime Media Culture» 2020.
 
27.
Nacos B. L., Bloch-Elkon Y., Shapiro R. Y., Prevention of Terrorism in Post-9/11 America: News Coverage, Public Perceptions, and the Politics of Homeland Security, «Terrorism and Political Violence» 2007, No. 20/1.
 
28.
Ochoa Ch. S., Gadinger F., Yildiz T., Surveillance under dispute: Conceptualising narrative legitimation politics, «European Journal of International Security» 2021, No. 6/2.
 
29.
Rios R., Lopez J., Cuellar J., Location Privacy in Wireless Sensor Networks, CRC Press 2016.
 
30.
Sinha G. A., NSA Surveillance Since 9/11 and the Human Right to Privacy, «Loyola Law Review» 2014, No. 9.
 
31.
Stam V., The 9/11 Generation: Youth, Rights, and Solidarity in the War on Terror, «Surveillance & Society» 2018, No. 16/1.
 
32.
Tromblay D. E., Botching Bio-Surveillance: The Department of Homeland Security and COVID-19 Pandemic, «International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence» 2022, No. 35/1.
 
33.
Weiler J. H. H., COVID, Europe, and the Self-Asphyxiation of Democracy, [in:] M. Poiares Maduro, P. W. Kahn (eds.), Democracy in Times of Pandemic, Cambridge University Press 2020.
 
34.
Williams R. W., Terrorism, anti-terrorism and the normative boundaries of the US polity: The spatiality of politics after 11 September 2001, «Space and Polity» 2003, No. 7/3.
 
ISSN:1640-8888